Five United Nations human rights experts have joined the growing calls for Singapore to halt the execution of Nagaenthran Dharmalingam, a Malaysian convicted of drug smuggling more than 10 years ago, because of his learning disabilities.
The 33-year-old, who was sentenced to death in 2010 after being caught crossing the border the year before with 42.72 grams of diamorphine, was due to be hanged on Wednesday, but the punishment was put on hold after a last-ditch appeal filed by his lawyers.
They argue that Nagaenthran’s IQ of 69 affects his ability to make informed decisions.
The appeal court was due to consider the case on Tuesday, but the appeal was postponed after Nagaenthran was diagnosed with COVID-19.
The UN experts noted that countries that retained the death penalty were only allowed to impose it for the most serious crimes “that is those involving intentional killings” and that drug offenses did not meet that threshold. They urged the Singapore government to commute the sentence per international law.
“Resorting to this type of punishment to prevent drug trafficking is not only illegal under international law, it is also ineffective,” the statement said. “There is a lack of any persuasive evidence that the death penalty contributes more than any other punishment to eradicating drug trafficking.”
The case has attracted global attention with legal experts, human rights groups, the European Union and even British entrepreneur Richard Branson urging the Singapore government to review the sentence. In a rare intervention, Malaysian Prime Minister Ismail Sabri and other senior politicians in Malaysia have also appealed to Singapore over the case.
On Tuesday, Amnesty International urged the authorities to allocate adequate time to the appeal.
“To meet international standards of fairness, an appeal must not be rushed, but needs to serve as a meaningful opportunity to reconsider Nagaenthran’s case,” Rachel Chhoa-Howard, its Singapore researcher, said in a statement calling for the execution to be called off. “There is wide evidence of multiple human rights violations including deep concerns about Nagaenthran’s mental capacity and current health condition, which would render his execution unlawful, and must be fully addressed.”
The UN experts also expressed concern about Nagaenthran’s questioning after his arrest, noting he did not have access to “procedural accommodations for his disability during his interrogation”. They also highlighted that the death penalty should not be carried out on those with serious psychosocial and intellectual disabilities. Here